Ford F150 2020 vs Mitsubishi L 200 2018
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ford F150 is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Mitsubishi L 200 has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Engines: | 2.7 - 3.5 (petrol, diesel) | 2.3 - 2.4 (diesel) | |
| Both cars are available with diesel engines. Ford F150 is available also with petrol engines. Petrol engines typically offer smoother operation and quicker acceleration compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 250 - 450 HP | 150 - 181 HP | |
| Torque: | 542 - 691 NM | 380 - 430 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.2 - 11.8 | 7.6 - 8.6 | |
|
On average, Ford F150 equipped with diesel engines consume 2.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi L 200. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.91 m | 5.27 m | |
| Width: | 2.03 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.96 m | 1.79 m | |
|
Ford F150 is larger. Ford F150 is 64 cm longer than the Mitsubishi L 200, 21 cm wider, while the height of Ford F150 is 17 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1495 litres | 1061 litres | |
|
Ford F150 has more luggage capacity. Ford F150 has 434 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi L 200. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 3`321 | ~ 2`850 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 42 600 | 30 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford F150 has
|
Mitsubishi L 200 has
| |