Ford F150 2003 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 1991
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ford F150 is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Mitsubishi Pajero has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ford F150 is available with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Mitsubishi Pajero can be equipped only with four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Ford F150 also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 4.6 - 5.4 (petrol) | 2.4 - 3.5 (petrol, diesel) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol engines. Mitsubishi Pajero is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 231 - 300 HP | 99 - 245 HP | |
| Torque: | 397 - 495 NM | 211 - 343 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 10 - 25.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.2 - 14.7 | 11.0 - 14.5 | |
|
Ford F150 petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mitsubishi Pajero. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.68 m | 4.71 m | |
| Width: | 2.00 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.90 m | 1.88 m | |
|
Ford F150 is larger. Ford F150 is 97 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Pajero, 26 cm wider, while the height of Ford F150 is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 1350 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2600 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 13.7 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford F150 is 1.9 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means Ford F150 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 3`149 | ~ 3`073 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 10 000 | 4400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford F150 has
|
Mitsubishi Pajero has
| |