Ford F150 2003 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 1998
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Ford F150 is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Jeep Grand Cherokee has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
Engines: | 4.6 - 5.4 (petrol) | 2.7 - 4.7 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 231 - 300 HP | 140 - 258 HP | |
Torque: | 397 - 495 NM | 295 - 425 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 8.3 - 14 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.2 - 14.7 | 9.7 - 16.5 | |
Ford F150 petrol engines consumes on average 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than Jeep Grand Cherokee. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 5.68 m | 4.61 m | |
Width: | 2.00 m | 1.85 m | |
Height: | 1.90 m | 1.79 m | |
Ford F150 is larger. Ford F150 is 107 cm longer than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, 16 cm wider, while the height of Ford F150 is 11 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 1104 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2047 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 13.7 meters | 11.9 meters | |
The turning circle of the Ford F150 is 1.8 metres more than that of the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means Ford F150 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 3`149 | ~ 2`447 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | below average | |
Average price (€): | 10 000 | 3400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Ford F150 has
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |