Ford F150 2003 vs Skoda Octavia 2017
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Crossover / SUV | Estate car / wagon | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Ford F150 is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Skoda Octavia has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ford F150 is available with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Skoda Octavia can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Ford F150 also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 4.6 - 5.4 (petrol) | 1.0 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol engines. Skoda Octavia is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 231 - 300 HP | 86 - 230 HP | |
| Torque: | 397 - 495 NM | 160 - 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 6.8 - 12.3 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.2 - 14.7 | 3.9 - 6.6 | |
|
Ford F150 petrol engines consumes on average 8.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than Skoda Octavia. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.68 m | 4.67 m | |
| Width: | 2.00 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.90 m | 1.47 m | |
|
Ford F150 is larger. Ford F150 is 102 cm longer than the Skoda Octavia, 19 cm wider, while the height of Ford F150 is 43 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 610 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1740 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 13.7 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford F150 is 3.1 metres more than that of the Skoda Octavia, which means Ford F150 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 3`149 | ~ 1`916 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 10 000 | 10 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford F150 has
|
Skoda Octavia has
| |