Ford F150 2003 vs Land Rover Range Rover 2005
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Ford F150 is available with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Land Rover Range Rover can be equipped only with four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Ford F150 also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
Engines: | 4.6 - 5.4 (petrol) | 2.9 - 4.4 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 231 - 300 HP | 174 - 396 HP | |
Torque: | 397 - 495 NM | 390 - 640 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 7.5 - 13.6 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.2 - 14.7 | 11.3 - 16.0 | |
Ford F150 petrol engines consumes on average 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Land Rover Range Rover. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 5.68 m | 4.95 m | |
Width: | 2.00 m | 1.96 m | |
Height: | 1.90 m | 1.82 m | |
Ford F150 is larger. Ford F150 is 73 cm longer than the Land Rover Range Rover, 4 cm wider, while the height of Ford F150 is 8 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 535 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 13.7 meters | 11.6 meters | |
The turning circle of the Ford F150 is 2.1 metres more than that of the Land Rover Range Rover, which means Ford F150 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 3`149 | ~ 3`500 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 10 000 | 7200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Ford F150 has
|
Land Rover Range Rover has
| |