Ford F150 2003 vs Ford Ranger 2006
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ford F150 is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Ford Ranger has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Engines: | 4.6 - 5.4 (petrol) | 2.3 - 4.0 (petrol, diesel) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol engines. Ford Ranger is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 231 - 300 HP | 84 - 207 HP | |
| Torque: | 397 - 495 NM | 195 - 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 12.5 - 13.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.2 - 14.7 | 8.9 - 10.2 | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.68 m | 5.08 m | |
| Width: | 2.00 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.90 m | 1.73 m | |
|
Ford F150 is larger. Ford F150 is 60 cm longer than the Ford Ranger, 22 cm wider, while the height of Ford F150 is 17 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 1500 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 13.7 meters | 12.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford F150 is 1.1 metres more than that of the Ford Ranger, which means Ford F150 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 3`149 | ~ 2`986 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 10 000 | 7200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford F150 has
|
Ford Ranger has
| |