Ford F150 2003 vs Chevrolet Blazer 1994
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ford F150 is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Chevrolet Blazer has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Engines: | 4.6 - 5.4 | 4.3 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 231 - 300 HP | 193 HP | |
| Torque: | 397 - 495 NM | 353 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 10.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.2 - 14.7 | 13.6 | |
|
Ford F150 petrol engines consumes on average 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than Chevrolet Blazer. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.68 m | 4.59 m | |
| Width: | 2.00 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.90 m | 1.61 m | |
|
Ford F150 is larger. Ford F150 is 109 cm longer than the Chevrolet Blazer, 24 cm wider, while the height of Ford F150 is 29 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 1056 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2098 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 13.7 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford F150 is 1.7 metres more than that of the Chevrolet Blazer, which means Ford F150 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 3`149 | ~ 2`423 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 10 000 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford F150 has
|
Chevrolet Blazer has
| |