Ford F150 2009 vs Chrysler 300C 2004
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Body: | Crossover / SUV | Sedan | |
---|---|---|---|
Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
Engines: | 3.5 - 6.2 (petrol) | 2.7 - 6.1 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 248 - 411 HP | 193 - 425 HP | |
Torque: | 294 - 588 NM | 257 - 570 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 5 - 11 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.4 - 15.7 | 8.1 - 14.0 | |
Ford F150 petrol engines consumes on average 1.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than Chrysler 300C. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 5.89 m | 5.02 m | |
Width: | 2.02 m | 1.88 m | |
Height: | 1.91 m | 1.48 m | |
Ford F150 is larger. Ford F150 is 87 cm longer than the Chrysler 300C, 14 cm wider, while the height of Ford F150 is 43 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 1572 litres | 504 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1855 litres | 504 litres | |
Ford F150 has more luggage capacity. Ford F150 has 1068 litres more trunk space than the Chrysler 300C. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford F150 (by 1351 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 14.3 meters | 12 meters | |
The turning circle of the Ford F150 is 2.3 metres more than that of the Chrysler 300C, which means Ford F150 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 3`390 | ~ 2`269 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 16 800 | 3800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Ford F150 has
|
Chrysler 300C has
| |