Ford F150 2009 vs Toyota Tundra 2008
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 3.5 - 6.2 | 4.0 - 5.7 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 248 - 411 HP | 236 - 386 HP | |
| Torque: | 294 - 588 NM | 361 - 544 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 6.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.4 - 15.7 | 13.1 - 15.3 | |
|
Ford F150 petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than Toyota Tundra. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.89 m | 5.81 m | |
| Width: | 2.02 m | 2.03 m | |
| Height: | 1.91 m | 1.94 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Ford F150 is 8 cm longer than the Toyota Tundra, width is practically the same , while the height of Ford F150 is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1572 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1855 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 14.3 meters | 13.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford F150 is 0.7 metres more than that of the Toyota Tundra, which means Ford F150 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 3`390 | ~ 3`085 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 16 800 | 20 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford F150 has
|
| |