Ford F150 2009 vs Chevrolet Tahoe 2007
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 3.5 - 6.2 | 4.8 - 6.2 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 248 - 411 HP | 295 - 395 HP | |
| Torque: | 294 - 588 NM | 414 - 565 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 8.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.4 - 15.7 | 10.8 - 13.5 | |
|
Ford F150 petrol engines consumes on average 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than Chevrolet Tahoe. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.89 m | 5.13 m | |
| Width: | 2.02 m | 2.01 m | |
| Height: | 1.91 m | 1.96 m | |
|
Ford F150 is larger, but lower. Ford F150 is 76 cm longer than the Chevrolet Tahoe, 1 cm wider, while the height of Ford F150 is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1572 litres | 479 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1855 litres | 3084 litres | |
| Ford F150 has 1093 litres more trunk space than the Chevrolet Tahoe. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Chevrolet Tahoe (by 1229 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 14.3 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford F150 is 2.4 metres more than that of the Chevrolet Tahoe, which means Ford F150 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 3`390 | ~ 3`266 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 16 800 | 15 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford F150 has
|
Chevrolet Tahoe has
| |