Ford F150 2017 vs Toyota Tundra 2013
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.7 - 5.0 | 4.0 - 5.7 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 290 - 450 HP | 270 - 381 HP | |
| Torque: | 359 - 691 NM | 377 - 543 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.7 - 14.7 | 13.8 - 15.7 | |
|
Ford F150 petrol engines consumes on average 2.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than Toyota Tundra. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Ground clearance: | 292 mm (11.5 inches) | 254 - 269 mm (10 - 10.6 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Ford F150 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.89 m | 5.81 m | |
| Width: | 2.03 m | 2.03 m | |
| Height: | 1.92 m | 1.93 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Ford F150 is 8 cm longer than the Toyota Tundra, width is practically the same , while the height of Ford F150 is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 2192 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 14.9 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 3`115 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 38 800 | 34 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford F150 has
|
Toyota Tundra has
| |