Ford F150 2014 vs Volvo V40 2012
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Body: | Crossover / SUV | Hatchback | |
---|---|---|---|
Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
Ford F150 is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Volvo V40 has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Ford F150 is available with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Volvo V40 can be equipped only with front wheel drive. | |||
Engines: | 2.7 - 4.9 (petrol) | 1.6 - 2.5 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 282 - 385 HP | 115 - 254 HP | |
Torque: | 343 - 570 NM | 220 - 400 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 6.3 - 12.3 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.7 - 13.8 | 3.2 - 9.0 | |
Ford F150 petrol engines consumes on average 5.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volvo V40. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 5.89 m | 4.37 m | |
Width: | 2.03 m | 1.83 m | |
Height: | 1.92 m | 1.44 m | |
Ford F150 is larger. Ford F150 is 152 cm longer than the Volvo V40, 20 cm wider, while the height of Ford F150 is 48 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 1495 litres | 335 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2200 litres | no data | |
Ford F150 has more luggage capacity. Ford F150 has 1160 litres more trunk space than the Volvo V40. | |||
Turning diameter: | no data | 11.2 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 1`976 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | above average | |
Average price (€): | 28 800 | 8200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Ford F150 has
|
Volvo V40 has
| |