Ford F150 2014 vs Chevrolet Suburban 2006
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.7 - 4.9 | 5.3 - 6.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 282 - 385 HP | 324 - 366 HP | |
| Torque: | 343 - 570 NM | 470 - 510 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.7 - 13.8 | 12.9 - 13.2 | |
|
Ford F150 petrol engines consumes on average 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Chevrolet Suburban. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.89 m | 5.65 m | |
| Width: | 2.03 m | 2.01 m | |
| Height: | 1.92 m | 1.95 m | |
|
Ford F150 is larger, but slightly lower. Ford F150 is 24 cm longer than the Chevrolet Suburban, 2 cm wider, while the height of Ford F150 is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1495 litres | 1297 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2200 litres | 3890 litres | |
| Ford F150 has 198 litres more trunk space than the Chevrolet Suburban. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Chevrolet Suburban (by 1690 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 13.1 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 3`239 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 26 800 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford F150 has
|
| |