Ford Explorer 2019 vs Toyota Highlander 2019
| Comparing electrical vehicle (EV) with combustion engine (ICE) one is a complex task, but we are doing our best. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 3.0 Hybrid | 2.5 Petrol | |
| Hybrid engines (Ford Explorer) offer better fuel economy and lower emissions than petrol engines, especially in city driving with frequent stops. Petrol (Toyota Highlander) engines, however, are typically less expensive to buy and maintain, and offer more consistent performance on highways. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 349 HP | 186 HP | |
| Torque: | 555 NM | 237 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Ford Explorer engine produces 163 HP more power than Toyota Highlander, whereas torque is 318 NM more than Toyota Highlander. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Consumption: | 3.1 l/100km + 21.3 kWh/100km | 6.7 l/100km | |
| Fuel cost per 100km: | 12.20 € | 12.70 € | |
|
Change fuel prices per unit to adjust the calculation to the fuel prices in your country. Petrol€/lElectricity€/kWh | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 71 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | no data | 970 km in combined cycle | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 204 mm (8 inches) | 203 mm (8 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.06 m | 4.97 m | |
| Width: | 2.00 m | 1.93 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.76 m | |
|
Ford Explorer is larger. Ford Explorer is 10 cm longer than the Toyota Highlander, 7 cm wider, while the height of Ford Explorer is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 330 litres | 453 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 330 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 453 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2274 litres | 2387 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota Highlander (by 113 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.6 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Explorer is 1.2 metres more than that of the Toyota Highlander, which means Ford Explorer can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 3`160 kg | 2`722 kg | |
| Net weight: | 2`391 kg | 2`025 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 769 kg | 697 kg | |
| Ford Explorer load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 9 procentiem more than Toyota Highlander. Therefore, Ford Explorer is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 44 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Explorer has
|
Toyota Highlander has
| |
