Ford Explorer 2019 vs BMW X7 2018
| Comparing electrical vehicle (EV) with combustion engine (ICE) one is a complex task, but we are doing our best. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 3.0 Hybrid | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Hybrid engines (Ford Explorer) excel in urban environments with superior fuel efficiency and lower emissions during stop-and-go driving. Diesel engines (BMW X7), however, are more fuel-efficient on long highway trips and provide greater torque for towing and heavy loads. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 349 HP | 340 HP | |
| Torque: | 555 NM | 700 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6 seconds | 6.1 seconds | |
| Ford Explorer engine produces 9 HP more power than BMW X7, but torque is 145 NM less than BMW X7. Thanks to more power Ford Explorer reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Consumption: | 3.1 l/100km + 21.3 kWh/100km | 6.6 l/100km | |
| Fuel cost per 100km: | 12.20 € | 12.70 € | |
|
Change fuel prices per unit to adjust the calculation to the fuel prices in your country. Petrol€/lElectricity€/kWhDiesel€/l | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 71 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | no data | 1210 km in combined cycle | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 204 mm (8 inches) | 221 mm (8.7 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, BMW X7 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.06 m | 5.15 m | |
| Width: | 2.00 m | 2.00 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.81 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Ford Explorer is 9 cm shorter than the BMW X7, width is practically the same , while the height of Ford Explorer is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 330 litres | 326 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 330 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 326 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2274 litres | 2120 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford Explorer (by 154 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.6 meters | 13 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Explorer is 0.4 metres less than that of the BMW X7, which means Ford Explorer can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 3`160 kg | 3`295 kg | |
| Net weight: | 2`391 kg | 2`470 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 769 kg | 825 kg | |
| Ford Explorer load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 7 procentiem less than BMW X7. Therefore, BMW X7 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 63 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
BMW X7 has
| |