Ford Explorer 2018 vs Mazda CX-9 2016

 
Ford Explorer
2018 - 2019
Mazda CX-9
2016 -
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.3 Petrol2.5 Petrol

Performance

Power: 280 HP231 HP
Torque: 420 NM420 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: n/a secondsn/a seconds
Ford Explorer engine produces 49 HP more power than Mazda CX-9, the torque is the same for both cars.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 11.28.8
The Mazda CX-9 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Ford Explorer consumes 2.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-9, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Explorer could require 360 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 70 litres74 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 620 km in combined cycle840 km in combined cycle
740 km on highway830 km on highway
Mazda CX-9 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive)

Dimensions

Length: 5.02 m5.08 m
Width: 1.99 m1.97 m
Height: 1.79 m1.75 m
Ford Explorer is 6 cm shorter than the Mazda CX-9, 2 cm wider, while the height of Ford Explorer is 4 cm higher.
Seats: 7 seats7 seats
Trunk capacity: 595 litres407 litres
Trunk capacity with 7 seats: 595 litres407 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down, if possible
2313 litres2017 litres
In 7-seat version Ford Explorer has more luggage space (by 188 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford Explorer (by 296 litres).
Turning diameter: no data11.8 meters
Gross weight: no data2`640 kg
Safety: no data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 21 000no data
Pros and Cons: Ford Explorer has
  • more power
Mazda CX-9 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv