Ford Explorer 2018 vs Mazda CX-9 2016
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.3 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 280 HP | 231 HP | |
| Torque: | 420 NM | 420 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Ford Explorer engine produces 49 HP more power than Mazda CX-9, the torque is the same for both cars. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.6 | 8.4 | |
|
The Mazda CX-9 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Explorer consumes 2.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-9, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Explorer could require 330 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 74 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 660 km in combined cycle | 880 km in combined cycle | |
| 800 km on highway | 880 km on highway | ||
| Mazda CX-9 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.02 m | 5.08 m | |
| Width: | 1.99 m | 1.97 m | |
| Height: | 1.79 m | 1.75 m | |
| Ford Explorer is 6 cm shorter than the Mazda CX-9, 2 cm wider, while the height of Ford Explorer is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 595 litres | 407 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 595 litres | 407 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2313 litres | 2017 litres | |
| In 7-seat version Ford Explorer has more luggage space (by 188 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford Explorer (by 296 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.8 meters | |
| Gross weight: | no data | 2`570 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 21 000 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Explorer has
|
Mazda CX-9 has
| |