Ford Explorer 2015 vs Toyota 4-Runner 2003
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.5 Petrol | 4.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 249 HP | 245 HP | |
| Torque: | 346 NM | 382 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.7 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Ford Explorer engine produces 4 HP more power than Toyota 4-Runner, but torque is 36 NM less than Toyota 4-Runner. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.0 | 12.6 | |
|
The Ford Explorer is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Explorer consumes 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota 4-Runner, which means that by driving the Ford Explorer over 15,000 km in a year you can save 240 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 87 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 630 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
| 790 km on highway | 770 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - Part time 4WD | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.02 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.99 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.79 m | 1.76 m | |
|
Ford Explorer is larger. Ford Explorer is 22 cm longer than the Toyota 4-Runner, 11 cm wider, while the height of Ford Explorer is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 595 litres | 1195 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2050 litres | |
|
Toyota 4-Runner has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Ford Explorer has 600 litres less trunk space than the Toyota 4-Runner. This could mean that the Ford Explorer uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.1 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`440 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 22 000 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Explorer has
|
Toyota 4-Runner has
| |