Ford Explorer 2015 vs Dodge Durango 2013
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 3.5 Petrol | 3.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 249 HP | 294 HP | |
Torque: | 346 NM | 353 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.7 seconds | n/a seconds | |
Ford Explorer engine produces 45 HP less power than Dodge Durango, whereas torque is 7 NM less than Dodge Durango. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.0 | 11.2 | |
Ford Explorer consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Dodge Durango, which means that by driving the Ford Explorer over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 93 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 630 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
790 km on highway | 980 km on highway | ||
Dodge Durango gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dodge Durango 2013 3.6 engine: The variable valve timing regulators, oil pump, water pump, and thermostat are known for their limited lifespan. Another common issue is the clogging of oil channels with wear particles.
After ... More about Dodge Durango 2013 3.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 5.02 m | 5.11 m | |
Width: | 1.99 m | 1.92 m | |
Height: | 1.79 m | 1.80 m | |
Ford Explorer is 9 cm shorter than the Dodge Durango, 7 cm wider, while the height of Ford Explorer is 1 cm lower. | |||
Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
Trunk capacity: | 595 litres | 490 litres | |
Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 490 litres | |
Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 595 litres | no data | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2410 litres | |
Turning diameter: | no data | 12.5 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`948 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 15 800 | 27 200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Ford Explorer has
|
Dodge Durango has
| |