Ford Explorer 2010 vs Volvo XC90 2014
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.5 Petrol | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 249 HP | 225 HP | |
| Torque: | 345 NM | 470 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.7 seconds | 7.8 seconds | |
|
Volvo XC90 is a more dynamic driving. Ford Explorer engine produces 24 HP more power than Volvo XC90, but torque is 125 NM less than Volvo XC90. Despite the higher power, Ford Explorer reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.0 | 5.8 | |
|
The Volvo XC90 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Explorer consumes 5.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC90, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Explorer could require 780 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 71 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 630 km in combined cycle | 1220 km in combined cycle | |
| Volvo XC90 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.01 m | 4.95 m | |
| Width: | 2.00 m | 2.01 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.78 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Ford Explorer is 6 cm longer than the Volvo XC90, width is practically the same , while the height of Ford Explorer is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 595 litres | 615 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1886 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Ford Explorer has 20 litres less trunk space than the Volvo XC90. This could mean that the Ford Explorer uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.9 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`750 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 12 600 | 26 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Explorer has
|
Volvo XC90 has
| |