Ford Explorer 2010 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 2014
Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 3.5 Petrol | 3.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 249 HP | 178 HP | |
Torque: | 345 NM | 261 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.7 seconds | 12.6 seconds | |
Ford Explorer is more dynamic to drive. Ford Explorer engine produces 71 HP more power than Mitsubishi Pajero, whereas torque is 84 NM more than Mitsubishi Pajero. Thanks to more power Ford Explorer reaches 100 km/h speed 3.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.0 | 12.2 | |
The Ford Explorer is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Explorer consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means that by driving the Ford Explorer over 15,000 km in a year you can save 180 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 88 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 630 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
790 km on highway | 880 km on highway | ||
Mitsubishi Pajero gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 5.01 m | 4.90 m | |
Width: | 2.00 m | 1.88 m | |
Height: | 1.80 m | 1.87 m | |
Ford Explorer is larger, but lower. Ford Explorer is 11 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Pajero, 13 cm wider, while the height of Ford Explorer is 7 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 595 litres | 663 litres | |
Mitsubishi Pajero has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Ford Explorer has 68 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi Pajero. This could mean that the Ford Explorer uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
Turning diameter: | no data | 11.4 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`810 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 12 600 | 19 400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Ford Explorer has
|
Mitsubishi Pajero has
| |