Ford Explorer 2010 vs Toyota Land Cruiser 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.5 Petrol | 4.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 249 HP | 318 HP | |
| Torque: | 345 NM | 460 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.7 seconds | 8.6 seconds | |
| Ford Explorer engine produces 69 HP less power than Toyota Land Cruiser, whereas torque is 115 NM less than Toyota Land Cruiser. Due to the lower power, Ford Explorer reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.0 | 13.3 | |
|
The Ford Explorer is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Explorer consumes 2.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Land Cruiser, which means that by driving the Ford Explorer over 15,000 km in a year you can save 345 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 93 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 630 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
| 790 km on highway | 870 km on highway | ||
| Toyota Land Cruiser gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.01 m | 4.95 m | |
| Width: | 2.00 m | 1.97 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.87 m | |
|
Ford Explorer is larger, but lower. Ford Explorer is 6 cm longer than the Toyota Land Cruiser, 3 cm wider, while the height of Ford Explorer is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 595 litres | 259 litres | |
|
Ford Explorer has more luggage capacity. Ford Explorer has 336 litres more trunk space than the Toyota Land Cruiser. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 3`350 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 13 000 | 28 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Explorer has
|
Toyota Land Cruiser has
| |