Ford Explorer 2010 vs Nissan Pathfinder 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.5 Petrol | 3.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 249 HP | 260 HP | |
| Torque: | 345 NM | 325 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.7 seconds | 8.5 seconds | |
|
Nissan Pathfinder is a more dynamic driving. Ford Explorer engine produces 11 HP less power than Nissan Pathfinder, but torque is 20 NM more than Nissan Pathfinder. Due to the lower power, Ford Explorer reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.0 | 10.0 | |
| Ford Explorer consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Pathfinder, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Explorer could require 150 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 74 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 630 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
| 790 km on highway | 820 km on highway | ||
| Nissan Pathfinder gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.01 m | 5.01 m | |
| Width: | 2.00 m | 1.96 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.78 m | |
| Ford Explorer and Nissan Pathfinder are practically the same length. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 595 litres | 453 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 453 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 595 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2260 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 12 600 | 12 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Explorer has
|
Nissan Pathfinder has
| |