Ford Explorer 2010 vs Land Rover Range Rover 2009
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.5 Petrol | 5.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 249 HP | 510 HP | |
| Torque: | 345 NM | 625 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.7 seconds | 6.2 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover is a more dynamic driving. Ford Explorer engine produces 261 HP less power than Land Rover Range Rover, whereas torque is 280 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover. Due to the lower power, Ford Explorer reaches 100 km/h speed 2.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.0 | 14.9 | |
|
The Ford Explorer is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Explorer consumes 3.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover, which means that by driving the Ford Explorer over 15,000 km in a year you can save 585 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 105 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 630 km in combined cycle | 700 km in combined cycle | |
| 790 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
| Land Rover Range Rover gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.01 m | 4.97 m | |
| Width: | 2.00 m | 2.03 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 595 litres | 535 litres | |
|
Ford Explorer has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Ford Explorer has 60 litres more trunk space than the Land Rover Range Rover. The Land Rover Range Rover may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 12 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 3`200 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 13 000 | 15 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Explorer has
|
Land Rover Range Rover has
| |