Ford Explorer 2010 vs Land Rover Range Rover 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.5 Petrol | 4.4 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 249 HP | 339 HP | |
| Torque: | 345 NM | 700 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.7 seconds | 6.9 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover is a more dynamic driving. Ford Explorer engine produces 90 HP less power than Land Rover Range Rover, whereas torque is 355 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover. Due to the lower power, Ford Explorer reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.0 | 8.7 | |
|
The Land Rover Range Rover is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Explorer consumes 2.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Explorer could require 345 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 105 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 630 km in combined cycle | 1200 km in combined cycle | |
| 790 km on highway | 1380 km on highway | ||
| Land Rover Range Rover gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.01 m | 5.00 m | |
| Width: | 2.00 m | 2.07 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.84 m | |
| Ford Explorer and Land Rover Range Rover are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 595 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2030 litres | |
|
Ford Explorer has more luggage capacity. Ford Explorer has 45 litres more trunk space than the Land Rover Range Rover. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 12.3 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 3`200 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 12 600 | 47 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Explorer has
|
Land Rover Range Rover has
| |