Ford Explorer 2011 vs Ford Kuga 2013
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 240 HP | 150 HP | |
Torque: | 270 NM | 240 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.3 seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
Ford Explorer is more dynamic to drive. Ford Explorer engine produces 90 HP more power than Ford Kuga, whereas torque is 30 NM more than Ford Kuga. Thanks to more power Ford Explorer reaches 100 km/h speed 2.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.2 | 7.7 | |
The Ford Kuga is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Explorer consumes 2.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Kuga, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Explorer could require 375 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 60 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
830 km on highway | 950 km on highway | ||
Ford Kuga gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 5.01 m | 4.52 m | |
Width: | 2.00 m | 1.84 m | |
Height: | 1.79 m | 1.68 m | |
Ford Explorer is larger. Ford Explorer is 48 cm longer than the Ford Kuga, 16 cm wider, while the height of Ford Explorer is 11 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 1223 litres | 456 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1568 litres | |
Ford Explorer has more luggage capacity. Ford Explorer has 767 litres more trunk space than the Ford Kuga. | |||
Turning diameter: | no data | 11 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 2`700 | 2`250 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | average | |
Average price (€): | 12 600 | 11 400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Ford Explorer has
|
Ford Kuga has
| |