Ford Explorer 2005 vs Land Rover Range Rover 2002
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.6 Petrol | 4.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 295 HP | 282 HP | |
| Torque: | 406 NM | 440 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.9 seconds | 9.2 seconds | |
|
Ford Explorer is more dynamic to drive. Ford Explorer engine produces 13 HP more power than Land Rover Range Rover, but torque is 34 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover. Thanks to more power Ford Explorer reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 14.3 | 16.2 | |
|
The Ford Explorer is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Explorer consumes 1.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover, which means that by driving the Ford Explorer over 15,000 km in a year you can save 285 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 85 litres | 100 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 590 km in combined cycle | 610 km in combined cycle | |
| 720 km on highway | 790 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.91 m | 4.95 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.96 m | |
| Height: | 1.85 m | 1.82 m | |
|
Ford Explorer is smaller, but slightly higher. Ford Explorer is 4 cm shorter than the Land Rover Range Rover, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Explorer is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 385 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`825 | 3`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 5400 | 5400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Explorer has
|
Land Rover Range Rover has
| |