Ford Explorer 2003 vs Toyota 4-Runner 2003
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.6 Petrol | 4.7 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 242 HP | 235 HP | |
| Torque: | 382 NM | 434 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.6 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Ford Explorer engine produces 7 HP more power than Toyota 4-Runner, but torque is 52 NM less than Toyota 4-Runner. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 14.6 | 13.5 | |
|
The Toyota 4-Runner is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Explorer consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota 4-Runner, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Explorer could require 165 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 85 litres | 87 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 580 km in combined cycle | 640 km in combined cycle | |
| 680 km on highway | 720 km on highway | ||
| Toyota 4-Runner gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.81 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.81 m | 1.76 m | |
| Ford Explorer is 1 cm longer than the Toyota 4-Runner, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Explorer is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 391 litres | 1195 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2050 litres | |
|
Toyota 4-Runner has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Ford Explorer has 804 litres less trunk space than the Toyota 4-Runner. This could mean that the Ford Explorer uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.1 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`595 | 2`382 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4600 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Toyota 4-Runner has
| |