Ford Explorer 2002 vs Volvo XC90 2005
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.0 Petrol | 4.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 212 HP | 315 HP | |
| Torque: | 344 NM | 440 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.4 seconds | 7.3 seconds | |
|
Volvo XC90 is a more dynamic driving. Ford Explorer engine produces 103 HP less power than Volvo XC90, whereas torque is 96 NM less than Volvo XC90. Due to the lower power, Ford Explorer reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.0 | 14.0 | |
| Ford Explorer consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC90, which means that by driving the Ford Explorer over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 85 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 570 km in combined cycle | |
| 750 km on highway | 810 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.81 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.81 m | 1.74 m | |
| Ford Explorer is 1 cm longer than the Volvo XC90, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Explorer is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 391 litres | 249 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2404 litres | |
|
Ford Explorer has more luggage capacity. Ford Explorer has 142 litres more trunk space than the Volvo XC90. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 12.7 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`595 | 2`760 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 4600 | 4200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Explorer has
|
Volvo XC90 has
| |