Ford Explorer 2002 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.0 Petrol | 3.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 212 HP | 286 HP | |
| Torque: | 344 NM | 347 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.4 seconds | 9.1 seconds | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee is a more dynamic driving. Ford Explorer engine produces 74 HP less power than Jeep Grand Cherokee, whereas torque is 3 NM less than Jeep Grand Cherokee. Due to the lower power, Ford Explorer reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.0 | 11.4 | |
|
The Jeep Grand Cherokee is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Explorer consumes 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Explorer could require 240 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 85 litres | 93 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 810 km in combined cycle | |
| 750 km on highway | 1050 km on highway | ||
| Jeep Grand Cherokee gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Jeep Grand Cherokee 2010 3.6 engine: The variable valve timing regulators, oil pump, water pump, and thermostat are known for their limited lifespan. Another common issue is the clogging of oil channels with wear particles.
After ... More about Jeep Grand Cherokee 2010 3.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.81 m | 4.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.94 m | |
| Height: | 1.81 m | 1.78 m | |
|
Ford Explorer is smaller, but slightly higher. Ford Explorer and Jeep Grand Cherokee are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 391 litres | 457 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1554 litres | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has more luggage space. Ford Explorer has 66 litres less trunk space than the Jeep Grand Cherokee. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.3 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`595 | 2`948 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4600 | 10 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Explorer has
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |