Ford Explorer 2002 vs Toyota 4-Runner 2003
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.0 Petrol | 4.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 212 HP | 245 HP | |
| Torque: | 344 NM | 382 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.4 seconds | 7.8 seconds | |
|
Toyota 4-Runner is a more dynamic driving. Ford Explorer engine produces 33 HP less power than Toyota 4-Runner, whereas torque is 38 NM less than Toyota 4-Runner. Due to the lower power, Ford Explorer reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.0 | 12.2 | |
|
The Toyota 4-Runner is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Explorer consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota 4-Runner, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Explorer could require 120 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 85 litres | 87 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 710 km in combined cycle | |
| 750 km on highway | 770 km on highway | ||
| Toyota 4-Runner gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.81 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.81 m | 1.76 m | |
| Ford Explorer is 1 cm longer than the Toyota 4-Runner, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Explorer is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 391 litres | 1195 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2050 litres | |
|
Toyota 4-Runner has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Ford Explorer has 804 litres less trunk space than the Toyota 4-Runner. This could mean that the Ford Explorer uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.1 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`595 | 2`322 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4600 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Toyota 4-Runner has
| |