Ford Explorer 2002 vs Dodge Durango 2000
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.0 Petrol | 4.7 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 212 HP | 238 HP | |
| Torque: | 344 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.4 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Ford Explorer engine produces 26 HP less power than Dodge Durango, whereas torque is 56 NM less than Dodge Durango. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.0 | 14.9 | |
|
The Ford Explorer is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Explorer consumes 1.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Dodge Durango, which means that by driving the Ford Explorer over 15,000 km in a year you can save 285 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 85 litres | 95 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 630 km in combined cycle | |
| 750 km on highway | 680 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.81 m | 4.91 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.81 m | 1.80 m | |
| Ford Explorer is 9 cm shorter than the Dodge Durango, 2 cm wider, while the height of Ford Explorer is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 391 litres | 532 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2482 litres | |
|
Dodge Durango has more luggage space. Ford Explorer has 141 litres less trunk space than the Dodge Durango. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`595 | 2`744 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4600 | 3200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Explorer has
|
Dodge Durango has
| |