Ford Explorer 2002 vs Dodge Durango 1998
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.0 Petrol | 5.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 212 HP | 236 HP | |
| Torque: | 344 NM | 407 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.4 seconds | 20.2 seconds | |
| Ford Explorer engine produces 24 HP less power than Dodge Durango, whereas torque is 63 NM less than Dodge Durango. Despite less power, Ford Explorer reaches 100 km/h speed 10.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.0 | 16.8 | |
|
The Ford Explorer is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Explorer consumes 3.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Dodge Durango, which means that by driving the Ford Explorer over 15,000 km in a year you can save 570 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 85 litres | 95 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 560 km in combined cycle | |
| 750 km on highway | 640 km on highway | ||
| Ford Explorer gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.81 m | 4.91 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.81 m | 1.84 m | |
| Ford Explorer is 9 cm shorter than the Dodge Durango, 2 cm wider, while the height of Ford Explorer is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 391 litres | 532 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2482 litres | |
|
Dodge Durango has more luggage space. Ford Explorer has 141 litres less trunk space than the Dodge Durango. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`595 | 2`903 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4600 | 3200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Explorer has
|
Dodge Durango has
| |