Ford Explorer 1995 vs Toyota Land Cruiser 1990
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.0 Petrol | 4.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 207 HP | 156 HP | |
| Torque: | 339 NM | 298 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.9 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Ford Explorer engine produces 51 HP more power than Toyota Land Cruiser, whereas torque is 41 NM more than Toyota Land Cruiser. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.7 | 15.6 | |
|
The Ford Explorer is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Explorer consumes 1.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Land Cruiser, which means that by driving the Ford Explorer over 15,000 km in a year you can save 285 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 95 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 580 km in combined cycle | 600 km in combined cycle | |
| 720 km on highway | 730 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - Full time 4WD | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.81 m | 4.78 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.87 m | |
| Ford Explorer is 3 cm longer than the Toyota Land Cruiser, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Explorer is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 830 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1370 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Explorer is 0.5 metres less than that of the Toyota Land Cruiser, which means Ford Explorer can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`568 | 2`960 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2800 | 12 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Explorer has
|
| |