Ford Explorer 1995 vs Mitsubishi L 200 1996
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.0 Petrol | 2.5 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Ford Explorer) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Mitsubishi L 200) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 207 HP | 100 HP | |
| Torque: | 339 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.9 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Ford Explorer engine produces 107 HP more power than Mitsubishi L 200, whereas torque is 99 NM more than Mitsubishi L 200. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.7 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 75 litres | |
| 510 km with real consumption | 720 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - Full time 4WD | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.81 m | 4.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.66 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.57 m | |
|
Ford Explorer is larger. Ford Explorer is 31 cm longer than the Mitsubishi L 200, 22 cm wider, while the height of Ford Explorer is 23 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`568 | 2`835 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2800 | 4600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Explorer has
|
| |