Ford Explorer 1995 vs Land Rover Range Rover 1998
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.0 Petrol | 4.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 207 HP | 185 HP | |
| Torque: | 339 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.9 seconds | 12.2 seconds | |
|
Ford Explorer is more dynamic to drive. Ford Explorer engine produces 22 HP more power than Land Rover Range Rover, but torque is 1 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover. Thanks to more power Ford Explorer reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.7 | 15.3 | |
|
The Ford Explorer is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Explorer consumes 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover, which means that by driving the Ford Explorer over 15,000 km in a year you can save 240 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 100 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 580 km in combined cycle | 650 km in combined cycle | |
| 720 km on highway | 860 km on highway | ||
| Land Rover Range Rover gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - Full time 4WD | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.81 m | 4.71 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.82 m | |
| Ford Explorer is 10 cm longer than the Land Rover Range Rover, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Explorer is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Explorer is 0.4 metres less than that of the Land Rover Range Rover, which means Ford Explorer can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`568 | 3`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Explorer has
|
Land Rover Range Rover has
| |