Ford Explorer 2018 vs Mazda CX-9 2016
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.3 - 3.5 | 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 280 - 365 HP | 250 HP | |
| Torque: | 346 - 475 NM | 310 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.7 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| In general, Mazda CX-9 are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Ford Explorer. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.6 - 13.0 | 8.4 - 8.8 | |
|
Ford Explorer petrol engines consumes on average 3.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mazda CX-9. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 198 mm (7.8 inches) | 224 mm (8.8 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mazda CX-9 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.02 m | 5.08 m | |
| Width: | 1.99 m | 1.97 m | |
| Height: | 1.79 m | 1.75 m | |
| Ford Explorer is 6 cm shorter than the Mazda CX-9, 2 cm wider, while the height of Ford Explorer is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 595 litres | 407 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2313 litres | 2017 litres | |
|
Ford Explorer has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, The Mazda CX-9 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford Explorer (by 296 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.8 meters | |
| Gross weight: | ~ 3`178 kg | ~ 2`605 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 2`083 kg | ~ 1`903 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 1`095 kg | ~ 702 kg | |
| Ford Explorer load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 36 procentiem more than Mazda CX-9. Therefore, Ford Explorer is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 21 000 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Explorer has
|
Mazda CX-9 has
| |