Ford Explorer 2018 vs Audi Q7 2019
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 3.5 (petrol) | 2.0 - 3.0 (petrol, diesel, hybrid) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol engines. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 249 HP | 231 - 340 HP | |
| Torque: | 346 NM | 370 - 600 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.7 seconds | 5.4 - 7.1 seconds | |
| In general, Audi Q7 are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Ford Explorer. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.4 | 2.7 - 11.2 | |
|
Ford Explorer petrol engines consumes on average 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Audi Q7. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.02 m | 5.06 m | |
| Width: | 1.99 m | 1.97 m | |
| Height: | 1.79 m | 1.74 m | |
| Ford Explorer is 4 cm shorter than the Audi Q7, 2 cm wider, while the height of Ford Explorer is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 595 litres | 740 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1971 litres | |
|
Audi Q7 has more luggage space. Ford Explorer has 145 litres less trunk space than the Audi Q7. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 12.5 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 2`955 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Audi Q7 scores higher in safety tests. The Ford Explorer scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 24 000 | 44 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Explorer has
|
Audi Q7 has
| |
