Ford Explorer 2015 vs Toyota Highlander 2016
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Ford Explorer is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Toyota Highlander can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Toyota Highlander also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
Engines: | 3.5 | 2.7 - 3.5 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 249 - 345 HP | 188 - 296 HP | |
Torque: | 346 - 475 NM | 252 - 358 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.4 - 8.7 seconds | 8.8 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.0 - 12.3 | 9.5 - 10.7 | |
Ford Explorer petrol engines consumes on average 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Toyota Highlander. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 5.02 m | 4.89 m | |
Width: | 1.99 m | 1.93 m | |
Height: | 1.79 m | 1.77 m | |
Ford Explorer is larger. Ford Explorer is 13 cm longer than the Toyota Highlander, 6 cm wider, while the height of Ford Explorer is 2 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 595 litres | 269 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 813 litres | |
Ford Explorer has more luggage capacity. Ford Explorer has 326 litres more trunk space than the Toyota Highlander. | |||
Turning diameter: | no data | 11.8 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 2`677 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 15 800 | no data | |
Pros and Cons: |
Ford Explorer has
|
Toyota Highlander has
| |