Ford Explorer 2010 vs Ford Kuga 2013
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ford Explorer is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Ford Kuga has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 3.5 (petrol) | 1.6 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 240 - 345 HP | 140 - 182 HP | |
| Torque: | 270 - 485 NM | 230 - 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.4 - 8.7 seconds | 9.7 - 11.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.2 - 12.3 | 5.9 - 7.7 | |
|
Ford Explorer petrol engines consumes on average 3.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than Ford Kuga. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.01 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 2.00 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.69 m | |
|
Ford Explorer is larger. Ford Explorer is 48 cm longer than the Ford Kuga, 16 cm wider, while the height of Ford Explorer is 11 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1223 litres | 456 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1568 litres | |
|
Ford Explorer has more luggage capacity. Ford Explorer has 767 litres more trunk space than the Ford Kuga. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`700 | ~ 2`213 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 13 000 | 12 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Explorer has
|
Ford Kuga has
| |