Ford Explorer 2008 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 2005
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ford Explorer is available with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Jeep Grand Cherokee can be equipped only with four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Ford Explorer also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 4.0 - 4.6 (petrol) | 3.0 - 6.1 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 213 - 296 HP | 201 - 425 HP | |
| Torque: | 344 - 460 NM | 307 - 570 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.9 - 10.2 seconds | 5 - 10.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.5 - 14.3 | 10.2 - 16.4 | |
|
Ford Explorer petrol engines consumes on average 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Jeep Grand Cherokee. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.94 m | 4.75 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.83 m | 1.74 m | |
|
Ford Explorer is larger. Ford Explorer is 19 cm longer than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, width is practically the same , while the height of Ford Explorer is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 978 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1909 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`829 | ~ 2`750 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 5600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Explorer has
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |