Ford Explorer 2008 vs Mazda CX-9 2009

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Ford Explorer
2008 - 2010
Mazda CX-9
2009 - 2012
Gearbox: Automatic Automatic
Wheel drive type: Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
Ford Explorer is available with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Mazda CX-9 can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Ford Explorer also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs.
Engines: 4.0 - 4.63.7

Performance

Power: 213 - 296 HP273 HP
Torque: 344 - 460 NM367 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.9 - 10.2 secondsn/a seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 13.5 - 14.312.2 - 12.9
Ford Explorer petrol engines consumes on average 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mazda CX-9.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.94 m5.09 m
Width: 1.87 m1.94 m
Height: 1.83 m1.73 m
Ford Explorer is smaller, but higher.
Ford Explorer is 15 cm shorter than the Mazda CX-9, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Explorer is 11 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: no data487 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data2852 litres
Turning diameter: 11.2 meters11.4 meters
The turning circle of the Ford Explorer is 0.2 metres less than that of the Mazda CX-9.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 2`829~ 2`013
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): no data10 200
Pros and Cons: Ford Explorer has
  • also available in 2WD
Mazda CX-9 has
  • lower fuel consumption for petrol engines
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv