Ford Explorer 2005 vs Subaru B9 Tribeca 2006
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ford Explorer is available with rear wheel drive, while Subaru B9 Tribeca can be equipped with four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 4.6 | 3.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 295 HP | 245 HP | |
| Torque: | 406 NM | 297 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.9 seconds | 9.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 14.3 | 12.3 | |
|
Ford Explorer petrol engines consumes on average 2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Subaru B9 Tribeca. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.91 m | 4.86 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.85 m | 1.69 m | |
| Ford Explorer is 5 cm longer than the Subaru B9 Tribeca, width is practically the same , while the height of Ford Explorer is 16 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 385 litres | 450 litres | |
|
Subaru B9 Tribeca has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Ford Explorer has 65 litres less trunk space than the Subaru B9 Tribeca. This could mean that the Ford Explorer uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`825 | ~ 2`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 3600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Subaru B9 Tribeca has
| |