Ford Explorer 2005 vs Saab 9-7X 2005
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ford Explorer is available with rear wheel drive, while Saab 9-7X can be equipped with four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 4.6 | 4.2 - 5.3 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 295 HP | 290 - 300 HP | |
| Torque: | 406 NM | 373 - 447 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.9 seconds | 7.8 - 8.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 14.3 | 13.5 - 14.1 | |
|
Ford Explorer petrol engines consumes on average 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than Saab 9-7X. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.91 m | 4.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.85 m | 1.74 m | |
| Ford Explorer is 10 cm longer than the Saab 9-7X, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Explorer is 11 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 385 litres | 1127 litres | |
|
Saab 9-7X has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Ford Explorer has 742 litres less trunk space than the Saab 9-7X. This could mean that the Ford Explorer uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`825 | ~ 2`745 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 5800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Saab 9-7X has
| |