Ford Explorer 2005 vs Saab 9-7X 2005
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ford Explorer is available with rear wheel drive, while Saab 9-7X can be equipped with four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 4.6 | 4.2 - 5.3 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 295 HP | 290 - 300 HP | |
| Torque: | 406 NM | 373 - 447 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.9 seconds | 7.8 - 8.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 14.3 | 13.5 - 14.1 | |
|
Ford Explorer petrol engines consumes on average 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than Saab 9-7X. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.91 m | 4.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.85 m | 1.74 m | |
| Ford Explorer is 10 cm longer than the Saab 9-7X, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Explorer is 11 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 385 litres | 1127 litres | |
|
Saab 9-7X has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Ford Explorer uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight: | ~ 2`825 kg | ~ 2`745 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 5400 | 5800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Explorer has
|
Saab 9-7X has
| |