Ford Explorer 2002 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 2000
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ford Explorer is available with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Mitsubishi Pajero can be equipped only with four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Ford Explorer also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 4.0 - 5.4 (petrol) | 3.2 - 3.5 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 212 - 304 HP | 165 - 202 HP | |
| Torque: | 344 - 495 NM | 318 - 373 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.6 - 9.4 seconds | 10.6 - 13.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.0 - 14.6 | 9.5 - 14.2 | |
|
Ford Explorer petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mitsubishi Pajero. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.81 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.81 m | 1.86 m | |
| Ford Explorer is 1 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Pajero, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Explorer is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 391 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`595 | ~ 3`300 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 4600 | 3200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Explorer has
|
Mitsubishi Pajero has
| |