Ford Explorer 2002 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 1992
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 4.0 - 5.4 (petrol) | 2.5 - 5.9 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 212 - 304 HP | 116 - 237 HP | |
| Torque: | 344 - 495 NM | 278 - 472 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.6 - 9.4 seconds | 8.2 - 13 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.0 - 14.6 | 9.9 - 17.9 | |
|
Ford Explorer petrol engines consumes on average 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than Jeep Grand Cherokee. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.81 m | 4.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.81 m | 1.65 m | |
|
Ford Explorer is larger. Ford Explorer is 31 cm longer than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, 7 cm wider, while the height of Ford Explorer is 16 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 391 litres | 1136 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2255 litres | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Ford Explorer has 745 litres less trunk space than the Jeep Grand Cherokee. This could mean that the Ford Explorer uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.7 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`595 | ~ 2`410 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 4600 | 4800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Explorer has
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |