Ford Explorer 2002 vs Nissan Terrano 2002
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ford Explorer is available with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Nissan Terrano can be equipped only with four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Ford Explorer also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 4.0 - 5.4 | 2.7 - 3.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 212 - 304 HP | 125 - 154 HP | |
| Torque: | 344 - 495 NM | 278 - 343 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.6 - 9.4 seconds | 13.5 - 16.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.0 - 14.6 | 9.1 - 9.9 | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.81 m | 4.73 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.81 m | 1.81 m | |
|
Ford Explorer is larger. Ford Explorer is 8 cm longer than the Nissan Terrano, 7 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 391 litres | 115 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1900 litres | |
|
Ford Explorer has more luggage capacity. Ford Explorer has 276 litres more trunk space than the Nissan Terrano. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`595 | ~ 2`933 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4600 | 3200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Explorer has
|
Nissan Terrano has
| |