Ford Explorer 2002 vs Chevrolet Blazer 1998
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 4.0 - 5.4 | 2.2 - 4.3 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 212 - 304 HP | 114 - 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 344 - 495 NM | 180 - 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.6 - 9.4 seconds | 10.1 - 10.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.0 - 14.6 | 13.7 - 14.3 | |
|
Ford Explorer petrol engines consumes on average 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than Chevrolet Blazer. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.81 m | 4.62 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.81 m | 1.63 m | |
| Ford Explorer is 19 cm longer than the Chevrolet Blazer, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Explorer is 19 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 391 litres | 1903 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1920 litres | |
|
Chevrolet Blazer has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Ford Explorer has 1512 litres less trunk space than the Chevrolet Blazer. This could mean that the Ford Explorer uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 12 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`595 | ~ 2`196 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4600 | 3000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Explorer has
|
Chevrolet Blazer has
| |