Ford Excursion 1999 vs Chevrolet Suburban 1992
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 7.3 Diesel | 7.4 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Ford Excursion) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Chevrolet Suburban) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 250 HP | 294 HP | |
| Torque: | 576 NM | 558 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 10.4 seconds | |
|
Chevrolet Suburban is a more dynamic driving. Ford Excursion engine produces 44 HP less power than Chevrolet Suburban, but torque is 18 NM more than Chevrolet Suburban. Due to the lower power, Ford Excursion reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 167 litres | 159 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.76 m | 5.59 m | |
| Width: | 2.03 m | 1.96 m | |
| Height: | 1.94 m | 1.90 m | |
|
Ford Excursion is larger. Ford Excursion is 17 cm longer than the Chevrolet Suburban, 7 cm wider, while the height of Ford Excursion is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1359 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
4146 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 4`173 | 3`651 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 11 200 | 8000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Chevrolet Suburban has
| |