Ford Excursion 1999 vs Chevrolet Suburban 2000
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 6.7 Petrol | 6.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 314 HP | 325 HP | |
| Torque: | 578 NM | 488 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Ford Excursion engine produces 11 HP less power than Chevrolet Suburban, but torque is 90 NM more than Chevrolet Suburban. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 19.3 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 167 litres | 117 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.76 m | 5.57 m | |
| Width: | 2.03 m | 2.00 m | |
| Height: | 1.94 m | 1.96 m | |
|
Ford Excursion is larger, but slightly lower. Ford Excursion is 19 cm longer than the Chevrolet Suburban, 3 cm wider, while the height of Ford Excursion is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1359 litres | 1295 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
4145 litres | 3720 litres | |
|
Ford Excursion has more luggage capacity. Ford Excursion has 64 litres more trunk space than the Chevrolet Suburban. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford Excursion (by 425 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 4`037 | 3`900 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 10 800 | 12 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Excursion has
|
| |